Exposing the Illogical and Imaginary

Concepts of Theoretical Physics.

Somewhere in history a certain group of people decided that reality can be determined by math. This is pure delusion. The Universe existed long before there was anyone to enumerate it. Math is a powerful tool when applied to things that actually exist, but it can never prove a concept. Math is as referential as anything else and it can only prove itself.

To wit: Math can prove 2 + 2 = 4, but it can’t prove any "2s" or “4s” actually exist. Math proves nothing. It is useful as a measuring tool, not for shaping reality. 2 + 2 = 4 is only true without reference to anything but math. Math is symbolic logic, not a determinant of what reality truly is.

Can you show me minus four pounds? Can you show me a pi? Do 2 fish + 2 pairs of shoes = 4 dozen elephants? Of course not. This is ample demonstration that math only has meaning when it refers to itself or when applied to things that can actually be quantified. Math is only useful in measuring matter and motion. Math cannot quantify an idea or a distant galaxy. Math can’t tell you anything about why the Universe is the way it is. Only the folly of man can do that. There is more than one way to prove that math is just a “number game.”

Base 8, base 10, base 12, base 20 and base 60 prove math is just a tool, not a universal truth. All systems give a different value for 1111 items and all of them are true. Different numerical bases (e.g., base 8, 10, 12) are human conventions for representing quantities. In base 10, 1111 items are “1111”; in base 8, they’re “2167”; in base 12, they’re “793”. All are valid descriptions of the same quantity, just expressed differently. This shows math is a flexible tool, not an absolute truth about reality. It is nothing but math. It can only prove itself by definition. In the same way "12 is a dozen," “blue is a color,” and “attorneys are lawyers” is also true. “2 + 2 = 4” tell us nothing about the actual nature of elephants, colors or law.

People who rely on math make tests to support what they want to find. There is no proof any Big Bang or inflation happened, that the Universe is infinite or expanding or that time started. If math determines reality, then why do our meteorological predictions fail so frequently? They can’t even model last week’s weather effectively. If math shapes reality why haven’t we found any of the 4th through 15th dimensions?

2) Time

Even if I allow the standard model of physics “something from nothing” explanation of a beginning; time, space, motion and matter all happen simultaneously, so speaking of “before time” is still nonsensical. Splitting them when there is no time to split makes even less sense. Human language does not allow for a concept of no matter or motion. A sentence requires both a subject (matter) and a verb (movement)

Disregard of David Hume and the concept of infinite regression has cost humanity 350 years. Simply put, search for a “first cause” leaves one in an infinite quest to find out “what caused that?” Eventually we have to give up in futility and realize that at least one thing has happened uncaused, whether that be a creator being, a singularity or a preformed Universe.

Once you concede that at least one thing "happened" uncaused, the most elegant theory is that the uncaused thing that "happened" is the Universe itself. You also realize that a preformed universe is equally likely, no, more likely, than a singularity or a big bang.

This eliminates many of the problems with the SM and Lambda simply by releasing the concept of “time” as anything but a yardstick.

It makes “theoretical physics” live up to its name as none of it is warranted in logic or empirical evidence. Time does not exist. It is a yardstick, not a thing that is separate. If all matter is divisible and spacetime is a “thing” then hand me a slice of time; or at least show me a picture.

If time is a dimension can it bring me more presents last year? My tree was pretty empty last Christmas. I would gladly admit to being wrong and accept a few decades of my life back. Can physicists give me that? It’s a thing, right?

ALL of their inferential conclusions are based on inferential premises. Then they stack more inferences when the results don’t yield what they want. They quit the scientific method 160+ years ago when James Clerk Maxwell Smart, Agent 86, committed physics second deadly sin, enshrining “(c)” as a constant. All of their B.S. relies on more of their B.S. It is circular logic, at best.

Time does not exist independently from matter and motion. Without both matter and motion time is meaningless. Like any form of math, time is a tape measure and nothing more.

Matter cannot be expressed as anything but matter. Motion cannot be expressed as anything but motion. Therefore matter and motion are necessary to define the world around us and time is not.

All formulas that employ time can use its equivalent in matter and motion. Conversely time can only be explained using matter and motion, making it a dependent, human construct.

Treating time as a separate thing and adding (t) to formulas that do not require them has set science back 160 years. Maxwell united magnetism and electricity in a Frankenstein monster that has reproduced and brought more Illogical and unnecessary concepts such as: a beginning of time, a singularity, a big bang and/or expansion. None of them has ever been proven to be correct, meaningful or empirically grounded.

The ultimate proof that time is just a tool is called Daylight Savings Time and it happens across most of America 2 times annually. Convenience allows us to set our clocks however we want, and it never affects the rotation of the planet or its orbit around the sun.

3) Gravity

Newton committed physics original sin. Gravity is not constant, even here on earth, as local gravity variations have demonstrated since the 1730’s. Gravity is not caused by mass, it is a function of displacement. Newton is the start of the downfall of physics. He declared the first universal constant without ever leaving Europe. Can you spell overreach??? His law of gravitation is wrong, as is his law of inertia. Inertia simply does not exist. There is no such thing as a “rest state.” Every object in the universe is affected by everything else and their effects reveal themselves in gravity, vibration, magnetism, radiation and electricity.

The concept of anything that actually exists being at rest is simply overlooking everything except the observer’s perspective, which is the beginning of the end for physics. Tests conducted in the 1700’s & 1800’s, like Bouguer’s 1730’s latitude tests, Maskelyne’s 1770’s mountain test, and Airy’s 1850’s mines showed (g) varied with density—decades before Einstein. By 1868, global surveys mapped mGal swings, like Wilkes Land’s later -60 to +50 mGal.

Wilkes Land: The 1959–60 traverse and GRACE confirm pre-Einstein knowledge: density (mascon, thin crust) drives minor gravity swings. Textbooks such as the Geophysical Journal International cite anomalies, yet (G) persists.

Pre-1879 scientists didn’t just suspect—they measured variations. Physicists today know this (GRACE, geodesy), but G’s universal halo persists. Escape velocity for craft and particles is simply wrong. Helium balloons climb into the upper atmosphere at a leisurely pace, whereupon the balloon explodes due to it being over pressure in the Hydrogen dominated upper layer, some Helium atoms gain the last little push they need to go past the thin Hydrogen layer and into space and some stay trapped beneath the Hydrogen layer.

Buoyancy is gravity is buoyancy. Heavier particles occupy the lowest regions. the atmospheric layers directly correspond to the periodic table. The farthest from the Earth's surface is H, then He, traces of Li, Be, B, C then N, O and CO2 with heavier pollutants even lower.

4) Space

The next greatest myth in physics is the concept of space. Somehow the concept of infinite, empty space endures even though we know stars emit particles continuously. Space is neither empty nor infinite, it is just the least dense form of matter. Even intergalactic voids have ~10⁻⁶ atoms/cm³.

In order, matter goes from: space density to atmospheric (gas) density to fluid density (with Mercury as an exception) to solid density and lastly to stellar density. Space is never empty. Cosmic dynamics depend on space not being empty in order to work, even if you buy the Big Bang, which I do not. If the Big Bang happened, then the only way anything could ever stop is if there is resistance in “empty space.” Otherwise, the particles shoot eternally onward in different directions and higher matter never forms.

5) Electromagnetism

Thales of Miletus experiments with lodestones and static electricity proved they are independent phenomena. Millions of lightning strikes annually hitting metal poles, antennae and superstructures never magnetize the object struck, confirming their separate nature.

Rømer showed the inconstant speed of light in 1676, ~220,000 km/s and Fizeau’s 1851 light through water experiments show light is affected by its medium. Neither Faraday, Gauss nor Ampere suggested that electricity and magnetism are one and the same. In fact, they knew they were not. Each of them show that electricity can produce magnetism where none existed before in metal objects. There was no magnetic polarity in the metal object until the electricity was run through/around it. This showed that they are not the same, but James Clerk Maxwell Smart, Agent 86, decided that he would combine them despite the proofs of Thales, Franklin, Faraday, Gauss and Ampere.

Gauss, Faraday, Ampere’s Experiments

Carl Friedrich Gauss (1830s):

Contribution: Gauss’s law for electric fields (∇·E = ρ/ε₀) and magnetic fields (∇·B = 0). Electric fields arise from charges (ρ), magnetic fields have no monopoles—fields diverge differently.

Experiment: Measured electric fields around charged objects, magnetic fields near magnets. Static charges produce electric fields without magnetism and magnets produce magnetic fields with no charge flow.

Static electric fields (e.g., charged amber) don’t generate magnetism; static magnetic fields (e.g., lodestones) don’t induce currents.

Electromagnetism: Gauss’s laws underpin Maxwell, but focused on static fields, not dynamic links.

Michael Faraday (1830s):

Contribution: Electromagnetic induction—moving magnets induce currents in wires (∇×E = -∂B/∂t). Discovered magnetic fields affect light (Faraday effect).

Experiment: Rotated magnets near coils, measured currents (galvanometer). Static magnets don’t induce currents; static charges don’t magnetize—replicated in generators.

Distinctness: Static magnets (no motion) produce fields but no current; static charges (no flow) produce electric fields but no magnetism.

Electromagnetism: Induction links magnetism to electricity dynamically—basis for Maxwell’s unification.

André-Marie Ampere (1820s):

Contribution: Currents produce magnetic fields (Ampere’s law, ∇×B = μ₀J). Parallel wires with currents attract/repel due to magnetic fields.

Experiment: Measured magnetic fields around current-carrying wires—current (J) generates magnetism, no current, no field. Static magnets produce fields without currents.

Distinctness: No current (J = 0) means no magnetic field from electricity; static magnets (e.g., lodestones) need no current—your Junk Drawer magnets act alone.

Electromagnetism: Currents mimic magnets, unifying dynamic effects—Maxwell’s foundation.

Their experiments showed dynamic links (induction, current-to-field) but also static distinctions—charges without magnetism, magnets without electricity. Maxwell ignored static cases, unifying universally, contra your Junk Drawer and space/conductivity evidence.

Maxwell’s Unification (1861–1862)

Claim: Electricity and magnetism are one force—electromagnetism. Changing electric fields create magnetic fields (∇×B = μ₀J + μ₀ε₀∂E/∂t); changing magnetic fields induce electric fields (∇×E = -∂B/∂t). Light is an electromagnetic wave, speed c ≈ 299,792 km/s.

Data Selection Used: Faraday’s induction (dynamic), Ampere’s current-fields, Gauss’s field laws. Predicted waves (Hertz, 1880s) and c (Michelson-Morley, 1887).

Maxwell ignored static distinctions—Gauss’s charge-only electric fields, Faraday’s static magnets, Ampere’s no-current no-field and he cherry-picked dynamic data, ignoring static evidence and assuming c’s constancy without space tests.

Each person that followed James Clerk Maxwell Smart neglected the first rule of science: Prove, do not accept. I was able to prove him and everyone since him wrong with minimal research and application of everyday observations. The fact that electricity and magnetism are separate forces is found in millions of homes, millions of times per day, in their wiring, their computers and especially in their junk drawers.

1) Thales of Miletus proved they were separate forces before Christ was born and Maxwell defiled the works of real scientists like Gauss, Ampere and Faraday fouling all of modern physics with (c). 2) There is no electromagnetism that doesn’t come from moving the magnet. It is not a combined force unless you combine them.

Furthermore magnetism works in space and electricity does not work without a conductive pathway. The SM’s focus on electricity ignores magnetism’s primacy. Superconductivity’s core is magnetic field manipulation (e.g., Meissner effect, flux pinning) THEORY - magnetism works through neutrino interaction???

The Junk Drawer Analogy

Anyone who has a junk drawer has already seen these phenomena directly. The fact that “scientists” have overlooked and/or ignored this for over a century is incomprehensible and shameful. Throw as many D cell batteries as you want in the drawer. They neither discharge electricity not produce magnetism.

Meanwhile loose magnets find their way to other items made of materials that they can attach to without needing electricity to do it. We find that our screwdrivers, scissors or anything else that was attached to by magnets become magnetic themselves. This link required no electricity to happen. This proves conclusively that electricity and magnetism are not the same and that any formula that links them is inherently wrong except in the application of electromagnetism.

Maxwell somehow defined the speed of light despite having no equipment that could possibly measure it. The atom had never been seen. The speed of light was immeasurable in any length that makes any such claim as a “constant” or "limiting" speed is dull and thoughtless from the start. How can you say how long it takes light to travel in space and on Earth when you have never been to space? Scientific hubris has cost humanity 160 years of progress because, “We are modern man and we know better.” I would take Archimedes over everyone in Lambda's camp put together.

"Scientists" did not. They repeatedly showed that they were mystics rather than scientists. They chose to ignore Francis Bacon, William of Ockham, Rene Des Cartes and David Hume and built a cosmos that can only be accessed through the imagination, like the “scary door” behind Rod Serling.

6) Differential Rotation and Redshift Disproofs

This is another theory that defies all common sense as well. Anyone who has seen a merry go round or a cd turning knows that the center of the disc and the edge of the disc have the same rotational speed, but the outside edge has to travel a much greater distance to get to the same place, i.e. the person at the center of the merry go round always has the advantage.

Why would galaxies be different? They have to move together. If they do not is it any more extraordinary than Jupiter moving more slowly than mercury? This is another part of the red shift misinterpretation to go with their assumption that things have moved eternally in straight lines ever since the big bang despite their additional claims of curved space, gravitational lensing and SMBHs.

Galaxies Spin Like Records

(ω\omega\omega) everywhere, so outer stars move faster in linear speed v=ωrv = \omega rv = \omega r)

Take a 12-inch record at 33⅓ RPM (1.8 seconds per turn). Outer edge (radius 6 inches) has a circumference of 2π×6≈37.72\pi \times 6 \approx 37.72\pi \times 6 \approx 37.7 inches, speed 37.7÷1.8≈20.937.7 \div 1.8 \approx 20.937.7 \div 1.8 \approx 20.9 inches/second. At 2 inches from the center, circumference is 2π×2≈12.62\pi \times 2 \approx 12.62\pi \times 2 \approx 12.6 inches, speed’s 12.6÷1.8≈712.6 \div 1.8 \approx 712.6 \div 1.8 \approx 7 inches/second. Same RPM, but the outer edge screams along. Now a galaxy, 100,000 light-years across—radius 50,000 light-years. The Milky Way’s Sun, at 27,000 light-years out, moves at 828 km/s, period 225 million years. Angular speed is ω=2π/T=2π/(225×106×3.156×107 seconds/year)≈8.86×10−16 radians/second\omega = 2\pi / T = 2\pi / (225 \times 10^6 \times 3.156 \times 10^7 \text{ seconds/year}) \approx 8.86 \times 10^{-16} \text{ radians/second}\omega = 2\pi / T = 2\pi / (225 \times 10^6 \times 3.156 \times 10^7 \text{ seconds/year}) \approx 8.86 \times 10^{-16} \text{ radians/second}. If the galaxy spins at this fixed ω\omega\omega, a star at 50,000 light-years has. v=ωr=8.86×10−16×(50,000×9.461×1015 meters/light-year)≈2097 km/sv = \omega r = 8.86 \times 10^{-16} \times (50,000 \times 9.461 \times 10^{15} \text{ meters/light-year}) \approx 2097 \text{ km/s}v = \omega r = 8.86 \times 10^{-16} \times (50,000 \times 9.461 \times 10^{15} \text{ meters/light-year}) \approx 2097 \text{ km/s}. The outer stars are screaming along. Observed speeds are 200-250 km/s, but that’s averaged over gas clouds. High-velocity stars and outflows hit 1000+ km/s—my model’s closer. No dark matter is needed; the flat curve’s a misread of uniform spin. That speed gives redshift: z=v/c=2097/300,000≈0.007z = v/c = 2097 / 300,000 \approx 0.007z = v/c = 2097 / 300,000 \approx 0.007. At 500 Mpc, they measure z=0.116z = 0.116z = 0.116 (Hubble’s Law: v=H0dv = H_0 dv = H_0 d, H0≈70 km/s/MpcH_0 \approx 70 \text{ km/s/Mpc}H_0 \approx 70 \text{ km/s/Mpc} so v=35,000 km/sv = 35,000 \text{ km/s}v = 35,000 \text{ km/s} z≈0.116z \approx 0.116z \approx 0.116).

The experts don’t account for the Milky Way’s rotational part, the other star or galaxies rotation or orbital dynamics or even our own cosmic dynamics, so they overestimate “expansion.” The farther away the viewed galaxy or star, the more inconsistent redshift readings get. Current redshift theory is wrong, it is a combination of inferred data and incorrect observations. It is mostly rotation and differentials in velocity of the moving objects, i.e. galaxies.

They say inner stars move faster—828 km/s at 27,000 light-years—and outer ones slow to 200 km/s at 50,000 light-years. But gravity’s still there: F=GMm/r2F = GMm/r^2F = GMm/r^2. Slower outer stars can’t hold their orbit—they’d spiral inward, crashing into the faster ones. There would be supernovae everywhere. Galaxies wouldn’t hold their shape for 10 billion years, like the Milky Way has. We’d see chaos, not stable spirals. Their model’s a fantasy; uniform spin keeps stars in their lanes, no pile-ups. Redshift as expansion is wrong as well. They say v=H0dv = H_0 dv = H_0 d, so farther galaxies recede faster—proof of the Big Bang. But my rotational redshift (z≈0.007z \approx 0.007z \approx 0.007) eats a chunk of that. At 5000 Mpc,z≈1.16z \approx 1.16z \approx 1.16 They can’t correct for rotation because they can’t resolve the arms—readings get worse with distance. They assumed redshift means expansion, ignored rotation, and invented dark matter to fix their broken rotation curves. That’s not the Scientific Method. “The Differential Rotation Disproof,” (uniform spin: ω≈8.86×10−16 rad/s\omega \approx 8.86 \times 10^{-16} \text{ rad/s}\omega \approx 8.86 \times 10^{-16} \text{ rad/s} v≈2097 km/sv \approx 2097 \text{ km/s}v \approx 2097 \text{ km/s} rotational z≈0.007z \approx 0.007z \approx 0.007)

7) Comic Movement Backwards

The Cosmic Microwave Background is the most ridiculous concept in all of cosmology. Claiming to know what happened 13.8 billion years ago by looking at radiation in the 20th or 21st century on Earth is incomprehensibly stupid. It is like going to the All England Lawn Tennis Club, taking a picture at center court today and declaring who won the 1934 ladies doubles at Wimbledon by taking a picture in 2025. It is mind-numbingly imbecilic.

It is more of an overreach than analyzing a single drop of dew and claiming to know what lies in the Marianas Trench. It is like analyzing my DNA to inform you about Trilobites.

In fact, per their own theories, their act of observing the Universe may have caused the Comic Movement Backwards. They know not if there was a cosmic microwave background the day before they measured. The microwaves may have been hanging out in their local cosmic cabana and one of them said, “Hey, those guys are getting ready to observe us. It’s time to photobomb!!! Places everyone!!!”

Furthermore, per the standard model of physics, internal movement stops at absolute zero, so above absolute zero is a minimal operating condition for the universe and the 2.7 Kelvin is a pulse, not a ghost. Per Lambda CDM, motion stops at “absolute zero,” which is just another unproven “glory math” concept. In fact we have no way to measure such a temperature.

They are wrong, of course. Why would a body that is already in orbital motion stop? Wouldn’t the fact that there is orbital motion keep the universe from being at zero K in any event? Did the microwaves emitted 13.7 billion years ago have nothing better to do than hang out in this part of the universe instead of “boldly going where no imaginary particle has gone before?”

Downstream Effects

As near as I can tell people stopped demanding proof for outrageous claims shortly before James Clerk Maxwell Smart, Agent 86, committed Physic’s 2nd deadly sin, (c). The “speed of light in a vacuum” has been an accepted standard despite the fact that no one has ever been a light year away to prove the concept even on a minimal scale and the fact that their own cosmology states that a “vacuum” doesn’t exist in space. This was accepted as valid for 160 years. It was never valid for a single second. The formulas of Faraday, Gauss and Ampere work perfectly without Maxwell’s misguidance. He created a Frankenstein monster that was celebrated rather than destroyed.

The Greatest Myths of Physics

Introduction to Humility

More than 99% of known matter is in stars. What we humans call stable matter is actually cosmic detritus and we are all mites living on stellar dandruff. The natural state of matter is STELLAR. The rest of the universe is a by-product and humanity is an accident. We are not pivotal, we are coincidental. There is no grand plan for anything. We will persist as long as the Universe allows it.

1) Math